DukeEnergyWritesDown

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Wednesday, 1 August 2012

Mining Industry Wins Mountaintop Removal Court Ruling

Posted on 10:46 by Unknown
Mountaintop Removal
U.S. District Judge Reggie B. Walton Tuesday threw out tougher water-quality standards issued by the Environmental Protection Agency aimed at curbing environmental damage from surface coal mines in Appalachia. The ruling by was a victory for the mining industry, which has been fighting the Obama administration over a form of mining known as mountaintop removal. The practice involves blasting mountains to extract coal and pushing large quantities of rock and soil into streams.

Last year, the EPA for the first time set limits on the amount of minerals that can be deposited in stream as the result of surface mining in Appalachian states. High levels of some minerals can harm aquatic life. The National Mining Association opposed the stricter standards and argued in a federal lawsuit that the agency had overstepped its authority by avoiding the federal government formal rule-making process, which requires formal notice and opportunity for public comment.

Judge Walton sided with the industry, writing that the EPA had infringed on the authority granted to states under the Clean Water Act and the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act. He said his ruling didn't address how to strike a balance between "the need to preserve the verdant landscape and natural resources of Appalachia and, on the other hand, the economic role that coal mining plays in the region."

The ruling follows a separate one in March in which another federal judge said the EPA went too far by trying to revoke a permit for the largest planned surface mine in West Virginia's history, after that permit had already been issued. The EPA has appealed that decision.

The EPA could try to issue similar water-quality standards through the official rulemaking process. (WSJ, 7/31/2012)
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Radon-222 Content In Natural Gas
    Fracking Opponents and Proponents Weigh In A debate is raging in the fracking area about the content of radioactive radon-222 in Marcellus ...
  • D.C. Water Management
    In 2004 the D.C. Water and Sewer Authority was forced to settle a federal lawsuit that claimed it failed for decades to stop its sewers from...
  • Sodium Sulfur Battery
    Sodium Sulfur (NaS) batteries are high capacity battery systems developed for electric power applications. A NaS battery consists of liquid...
  • White House Meets With Climate/Energy Stakeholders
    The White House with more than a dozen energy experts and industry officials last Thursday.  President Obama has pledged to focus aggressiv...
  • African American & Latino Energy Employment Program (ALEEP)
    The Center, through its outreach arm, the African American Environmentalist Association (AAEA), is implementing an African American & La...
  • (no title)
  • How Do Coal Scrubbers Work?
    Coal Pollution Coal is not a clean-burning substance. It produces sulfur dioxide, which causes acid rain; nitrogen oxide, which causes smo...
  • EPA & USDA Partner To Reduce Wasted Food
    Today, EPA and USDA announced the launch of a challenge that asks farmers, processors, manufacturers, retailers, communities and government...
  • Carbon Dioxide Emissions Rose 1.4 Percent in 2012
    Global emissions of carbon dioxide from energy use rose 1.4 percent to 31.6 gigatons in 2012, setting a record and putting the planet on cou...
  • GAO Report on EPA Regulations and Electricity
    The General Accounting Office (GAO) recently completed a report ( summary ) on the effects of Environmental Protection Agency regulations o...

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (245)
    • ►  August (16)
    • ►  July (36)
    • ►  June (34)
    • ►  May (26)
    • ►  April (33)
    • ►  March (31)
    • ►  February (27)
    • ►  January (42)
  • ▼  2012 (255)
    • ►  December (33)
    • ►  November (49)
    • ►  October (11)
    • ►  September (36)
    • ▼  August (31)
      • NRC Denies License for Proposed Calvert Cliffs Nuc...
      • New Stormwater Management Rule in Washington, DC
      • Continuous Emissions Monitoring System (CEMS)
      • Big Coal Faces Steel Slowdown Amid Shale-Gas Pain
      • Pennsylvania DEP Amending Fracking Rules
      • Projected Natural Gas Prices Depend On Shale Gas E...
      • Obama Administration Finalizes 54.5 MPG Fuel Effic...
      • The White House Forum on Urban Innovation
      • HUD Innovation of the Day
      • Center Partners With Water Management, Inc
      • Exelon and First Solar
      • Center Seeking Keystone Pipeline Construction Cont...
      • Mitt Romney Energy Plan
      • Shipbreaking in Brownsville, Texas
      • Natural Gas Key To Renewable Energy Use
      • Natural Gas v. Coal
      • Court Strikes Down EPA Cross State Air Pollution Rule
      • Natural Gas & Renewables Dominate 2012 Capacity Ad...
      • Resources For The Future: New Shale Gas Research
      • GAO Report on EPA Regulations and Electricity
      • Pipelines
      • Center Partners with S.L. Sibert Management & Cons...
      • DC Stormwater Proposed Rule (Tradable Stormwater R...
      • Environmental Liability Transfer & Sparrows Point ...
      • Paul Ryan's Family Energy Business Interests
      • Tidal Wave Power Project in Eastport, Maine
      • Exelon To Sell 3 Coal Power Plants for $400 Million
      • Sparrows Point Purchased For $72 million By Liquid...
      • New Ethanol Coalition Fights To Save Federal Biofu...
      • Murkowski or Wyden Will Chair Senate Energy
      • Mining Industry Wins Mountaintop Removal Court Ruling
    • ►  July (30)
    • ►  June (39)
    • ►  May (26)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile