DukeEnergyWritesDown

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Friday, 19 April 2013

EPA Proposes To Cut Pollutants Into Waterways By Power Plants

Posted on 14:01 by Unknown
In accordance with a consent decree and in line with requirements under the Clean Water Act, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) today will propose a range of options to help reduce dangerous pollutants, including mercury, arsenic, lead, and selenium that are released into America’s waterways by coal ash, air pollution control waste and other waste from steam electric power plants. Today’s proposal includes a variety of options for whether and how these different waste streams should be treated. EPA will take comment on all of these options, which it will use to help inform the most appropriate final standard.

Steam electric power plants currently account for more than half of all toxic pollutants discharged into streams, rivers and lakes from permitted industrial facilities in the United States. High exposure to these types of pollutants
has been linked to neurological damage and cancer as well as damage to the circulatory system, kidneys and liver.Toxic heavy metals do not break down in the environment and can also contaminate sediment in waterways and impact aquatic life and wildlife, including large-scale die-offs of fish. 

The proposal updates standards that have been in place since 1982, incorporating technology improvements in the steam electric power industry over the last three decades as required by the Clean Water Act. The proposed national standards are based on data collected from industry and provide flexibility in implementation through a phased-in approach and use of technologies already installed at a number of plants. Under the proposed approach, new requirements for existing power plants would be phased in between 2017 and 2022, and would leverage flexibilities as necessary.

Fewer than half of coal-fired power plants are estimated to incur costs under any of the proposed preferred options, because many power plants already have the technology and procedures in place to meet the proposed pollution control standards.

The four preferred options differ in the number of waste streams covered (such as fly ash handling systems, treatment of air pollution control waste and bottom ash), the size of the units controlled and the stringency of the treatment controls to be imposed. EPA estimates that the regulations would reduce pollutant discharges by 470 million to 2.62 billion pounds annually and reduce water use by 50 billion to 103 billion gallons per year.
EPA also announced its intention to align this Clean Water Act rule with a related rule for coal combustion residuals (CCRs, also known as “coal ash”) proposed in 2010 under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. The two rules would apply to many of the same facilities and would work together to reduce pollution associated with coal ash and related wastes. EPA is seeking comment from industry and other stakeholders to ensure that both final rules are aligned to reduce pollution efficiently and minimize regulatory burdens.

There are approximately 1,200 steam electric power plants that generate electricity using nuclear fuel or fossil fuels such as coal, oil, and natural gas in the U.S. Approximately 500 of these power plants are coal fired units which are the primary source of the pollutants being addressed by the proposed regulation. Power plants that are smaller than 50 megawatts would not be impacted by these new standards, and the majority of coal-fired power plants would incur no costs under the proposed standards.

The public comment period on the proposed rule will be open for 60 days after publication in the Federal Register. The agency is under a consent decree to take final action by May 22, 2014. (EPA)

More information


Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Radon-222 Content In Natural Gas
    Fracking Opponents and Proponents Weigh In A debate is raging in the fracking area about the content of radioactive radon-222 in Marcellus ...
  • D.C. Water Management
    In 2004 the D.C. Water and Sewer Authority was forced to settle a federal lawsuit that claimed it failed for decades to stop its sewers from...
  • Sodium Sulfur Battery
    Sodium Sulfur (NaS) batteries are high capacity battery systems developed for electric power applications. A NaS battery consists of liquid...
  • White House Meets With Climate/Energy Stakeholders
    The White House with more than a dozen energy experts and industry officials last Thursday.  President Obama has pledged to focus aggressiv...
  • African American & Latino Energy Employment Program (ALEEP)
    The Center, through its outreach arm, the African American Environmentalist Association (AAEA), is implementing an African American & La...
  • How Do Coal Scrubbers Work?
    Coal Pollution Coal is not a clean-burning substance. It produces sulfur dioxide, which causes acid rain; nitrogen oxide, which causes smo...
  • EPA & USDA Partner To Reduce Wasted Food
    Today, EPA and USDA announced the launch of a challenge that asks farmers, processors, manufacturers, retailers, communities and government...
  • Carbon Dioxide Emissions Rose 1.4 Percent in 2012
    Global emissions of carbon dioxide from energy use rose 1.4 percent to 31.6 gigatons in 2012, setting a record and putting the planet on cou...
  • (no title)
  • GAO Report on EPA Regulations and Electricity
    The General Accounting Office (GAO) recently completed a report ( summary ) on the effects of Environmental Protection Agency regulations o...

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (245)
    • ►  August (16)
    • ►  July (36)
    • ►  June (34)
    • ►  May (26)
    • ▼  April (33)
      • Improving the Grade Score of Energy Infrastructure
      • Federal Register Notice On Request To Restart San ...
      • EPA Critical of Bristol Bay Pebble Mine
      • EPA Critiques State Department EIS on Keystone XL ...
      • EPA Honors Winners of First-Ever Campus RainWorks ...
      • EARTH DAY: Invisible In 2013 and Date Should Be Moved
      • EPA Publishes 18th Annual U.S. Greenhouse Gas Inve...
      • EPA Proposes To Cut Pollutants Into Waterways By P...
      • Natural Gas Replacing Coal Produces CO2 Reduction ...
      • No Progress Made In Reducing CO2
      • Peabody Energy (Coal) 1st Quarter Earnings
      • 12 States To Sue EPA Over Delayed CO2 Rule
      • House Subcommittee Passes Bill To By-Pass Presiden...
      • In 5th Year, RGGI CO2 Allowance Market Remains Com...
      • California Wind Power
      • Old Oil Pipeline Welds Vulnerable To Failure
      • Online Nonprofit InsideClimate News Wins Pulitzer
      • Pipeline Company Use of Eminent Domain
      • Electricity Lines: Underground or Overhead?
      • Secretary of the Interior Sally Jewell
      • EPA Delaying GHG Rule
      • CEO Salaries: EEI & U.S. Chamber of Commerce
      • Obama FY 2014 Budget: Interior
      • Obama FY 2014 Budget: Environment
      • Obama FY 2014 Budget: Energy
      • DC Water "Lady Bird" Tunnel Machine Digging 13 Mil...
      • Renewables & Nuclear Power In California
      • Outdoor Air Pollution Killed 1.2 Million in China ...
      • Hydrogen from Methane Without CO2 Emissions?
      • No title
      • Exxon Mobil Arkansas Pipeline Spill
      • Energy Capital Partners
      • Japan To Create LNG Futures Market
    • ►  March (31)
    • ►  February (27)
    • ►  January (42)
  • ►  2012 (255)
    • ►  December (33)
    • ►  November (49)
    • ►  October (11)
    • ►  September (36)
    • ►  August (31)
    • ►  July (30)
    • ►  June (39)
    • ►  May (26)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile