DukeEnergyWritesDown

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Saturday, 11 May 2013

NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR THE ARCTIC REGION

Posted on 05:43 by Unknown
"The United States is an Arctic Nation with broad and fundamental interests in the Arctic Region, where we seek to meet our national security needs, protect the environment, responsibly manage resources, account for indigenous communities, support scientific research, and strengthen international cooperation on a wide range of issues ."1

1 National Security Strategy, May 2010.

The National Strategy for the Arctic Region sets forth the United States Government’s strategic priorities for the Arctic region. This strategy is intended to position the United States to respond effectively to challenges and emerging opportunities arising from significant increases in Arctic activity due to the diminishment of sea ice and the emergence of a new Arctic environment. It defines U.S. national security interests in the Arctic region and identifies prioritized lines of effort, building upon existing initiatives by Federal, state, local, and tribal authorities, the private sector, and international partners, and aims to focus efforts where opportunities exist and action is needed.


It is designed to meet the reality of a changing Arctic environment, while we simultaneously pursue our global objective of combating the climatic changes that are driving these environmental conditions. Our strategy is built on three lines of effort:

1. Advance United States Security Interests – We will enable our vessels and aircraft to operate, consistent with international law, through, under, and over the airspace and waters of the Arctic, support lawful commerce, achieve a greater awareness of activity in the region, and intelligently evolve our Arctic infrastructure and capabilities, including ice-capable platforms as needed. U.S. security in the Arctic encompasses a broad spectrum of activities, ranging from those supporting safe commercial and scientific operations to national defense.

2. Pursue Responsible Arctic Region Stewardship – We will continue to protect the Arctic environment and conserve its resources; establish and institutionalize an integrated Arctic management framework; chart the Arctic region; and employ scientific research and traditional knowledge to increase understanding of the Arctic.

3. Strengthen International Cooperation – Working through bilateral relationships and multilateral bodies, including the Arctic Council, we will pursue arrangements that advance collective interests, promote shared Arctic state prosperity, protect the Arctic environment, and enhance regional security, and we will work toward U.S. accession to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (Law of the Sea Convention).



Our approach will be informed by the following guiding principles:

•
Safeguard Peace and Stability – Seek to maintain and preserve the Arctic region as an area free of conflict, acting in concert with allies, partners, and other interested parties. Support and preserve: international legal principles of freedom of navigation and overflight and other uses of the sea and airspace related to these freedoms, unimpeded lawful commerce, and the peaceful resolution of disputes for all nations.

• Make Decisions Using the Best Available Information – Across all lines of effort, decisions need to be based on the most current science and traditional knowledge. 2

• Pursue Innovative Arrangements – Foster partnerships with the State of Alaska, Arctic states, other international partners, and the private sector to more efficiently develop, resource, and manage capabilities, where appropriate and feasible, to better advance our strategic priorities in this austere fiscal environment.

• Consult and Coordinate with Alaska Natives – Engage in a consultation process with Alaska Natives, recognizing tribal governments’ unique legal relationship with the United States and providing for meaningful and timely opportunity to inform Federal policy affecting Alaskan Native communities. (The White House)
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Radon-222 Content In Natural Gas
    Fracking Opponents and Proponents Weigh In A debate is raging in the fracking area about the content of radioactive radon-222 in Marcellus ...
  • D.C. Water Management
    In 2004 the D.C. Water and Sewer Authority was forced to settle a federal lawsuit that claimed it failed for decades to stop its sewers from...
  • Sodium Sulfur Battery
    Sodium Sulfur (NaS) batteries are high capacity battery systems developed for electric power applications. A NaS battery consists of liquid...
  • White House Meets With Climate/Energy Stakeholders
    The White House with more than a dozen energy experts and industry officials last Thursday.  President Obama has pledged to focus aggressiv...
  • African American & Latino Energy Employment Program (ALEEP)
    The Center, through its outreach arm, the African American Environmentalist Association (AAEA), is implementing an African American & La...
  • (no title)
  • How Do Coal Scrubbers Work?
    Coal Pollution Coal is not a clean-burning substance. It produces sulfur dioxide, which causes acid rain; nitrogen oxide, which causes smo...
  • EPA & USDA Partner To Reduce Wasted Food
    Today, EPA and USDA announced the launch of a challenge that asks farmers, processors, manufacturers, retailers, communities and government...
  • Carbon Dioxide Emissions Rose 1.4 Percent in 2012
    Global emissions of carbon dioxide from energy use rose 1.4 percent to 31.6 gigatons in 2012, setting a record and putting the planet on cou...
  • GAO Report on EPA Regulations and Electricity
    The General Accounting Office (GAO) recently completed a report ( summary ) on the effects of Environmental Protection Agency regulations o...

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (245)
    • ►  August (16)
    • ►  July (36)
    • ►  June (34)
    • ▼  May (26)
      • 9th Circuit Says Consent Decree Cannot Circumvent ...
      • White House Women’s Leadership Summit on Climate C...
      • FracFocus: Chemical Disclosure Registry
      • Kraft Pulp Mills NSPS Review
      • Tesla Automotive Repaid $465 Million Government Loan
      • DOE Secretary Ernest Moniz Sworn In Today
      • U.S. Chamber of Commerce Accuses Environmental Gro...
      • Tar Sands Petroleum Coke
      • DOE Approves LNG Exports To Non-Free Trade Nations
      • Interior Department Bureau of Land Management Issu...
      • Senate Confirms Ernest Moniz As Energy Secretary
      • California Governor Jerry Brown Proposes Borrowing...
      • S. 761: Energy Savings and Industrial Competitiven...
      • Sequester Cuts Weaken Readiness For Wildfire Season
      • NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR THE ARCTIC REGION
      • Republicans Fighting EPA & Gina McCarthy Nomination
      • Electricity Production From Plant Photosynthesis
      • Elizabeth "Izzy" Martin Recognized For Conservatio...
      • European Carbon Market In Trouble
      • AB 32: New Challenge Targets California Cap-and-Tr...
      • EIS Requirements For Fracking on BLM Lands
      • California Wildfires 2013
      • USDA and EPA Release New Report on Honey Bee Health
      • IRS raises Production Tax Credit, Defines Eligible...
      • U.S. Exports of Liquefied Petroleum Gases Projecte...
      • Ultra Supercritical Coal Power Plants
    • ►  April (33)
    • ►  March (31)
    • ►  February (27)
    • ►  January (42)
  • ►  2012 (255)
    • ►  December (33)
    • ►  November (49)
    • ►  October (11)
    • ►  September (36)
    • ►  August (31)
    • ►  July (30)
    • ►  June (39)
    • ►  May (26)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile