DukeEnergyWritesDown

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Wednesday, 31 July 2013

EPA Proposes Rule to Modernize Clean Water Act Reporting

Posted on 09:36 by Unknown
E-reporting initiative will increase efficiency, ease burden for states and improve public access to data

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed a rule that would modernize Clean Water Act (CWA) reporting processes for hundreds of thousands of municipalities, industries, and other facilities by converting to an electronic data reporting system. The proposed e-reporting rule would make facility-specific information, such as inspection and enforcement history, pollutant monitoring results, and other data required by permits accessible to the public through EPA’s website.

EPA estimates that, once the rule is fully implemented, the 46 states and the Virgin Island Territory that are authorized to administer the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program will collectively save approximately $29 million each year as a result of switching from paper to electronic reporting.

Currently, facilities subject to reporting requirements submit data in paper form to states and other regulatory authorities, where the information must be manually entered into data systems. Through the e-reporting rule, these facilities will electronically report their data directly to the appropriate regulatory authority. EPA expects that the e-reporting rule will lead to more comprehensive and complete data on pollution sources, quicker availability of the data for use, and increased accessibility and transparency of the data to the public.

The CWA requires that municipal, industrial or commercial facilities that discharge wastewater directly into waters of the United States obtain a permit. The NPDES program requires that permitted facilities monitor and report data on pollutant discharges and take other actions to ensure discharges do not affect human health or the environment.

Most facilities subject to reporting requirements will be required to start submitting data electronically one year following the effective date of the final rule. Facilities with limited access to the Internet will have the option of one additional year to come into compliance with the new rule. EPA will work closely with states to provide support to develop or enhance state electronic reporting capabilities.

EPA has already scheduled several webinars in an effort to help states, trade organizations, and other interested parties better understand the details and requirements of the proposed rule. Over the next few months, EPA expects to schedule additional webinar sessions.

The proposed rule will be available for review and public comment for 90 days following the publication date in the Federal Register. (EPA)

View the proposed rule in the Federal Register

More information on webinars
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Radon-222 Content In Natural Gas
    Fracking Opponents and Proponents Weigh In A debate is raging in the fracking area about the content of radioactive radon-222 in Marcellus ...
  • D.C. Water Management
    In 2004 the D.C. Water and Sewer Authority was forced to settle a federal lawsuit that claimed it failed for decades to stop its sewers from...
  • Sodium Sulfur Battery
    Sodium Sulfur (NaS) batteries are high capacity battery systems developed for electric power applications. A NaS battery consists of liquid...
  • White House Meets With Climate/Energy Stakeholders
    The White House with more than a dozen energy experts and industry officials last Thursday.  President Obama has pledged to focus aggressiv...
  • African American & Latino Energy Employment Program (ALEEP)
    The Center, through its outreach arm, the African American Environmentalist Association (AAEA), is implementing an African American & La...
  • How Do Coal Scrubbers Work?
    Coal Pollution Coal is not a clean-burning substance. It produces sulfur dioxide, which causes acid rain; nitrogen oxide, which causes smo...
  • EPA & USDA Partner To Reduce Wasted Food
    Today, EPA and USDA announced the launch of a challenge that asks farmers, processors, manufacturers, retailers, communities and government...
  • Carbon Dioxide Emissions Rose 1.4 Percent in 2012
    Global emissions of carbon dioxide from energy use rose 1.4 percent to 31.6 gigatons in 2012, setting a record and putting the planet on cou...
  • (no title)
  • GAO Report on EPA Regulations and Electricity
    The General Accounting Office (GAO) recently completed a report ( summary ) on the effects of Environmental Protection Agency regulations o...

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (245)
    • ►  August (16)
    • ▼  July (36)
      • EPA Proposes Rule to Modernize Clean Water Act Rep...
      • S. 1240: Nuclear Waste Administration Act of 2013
      • Sunrise Powerlink Transmission Project
      • Utility Bill Payment Scams
      • Maryland Governor Releases Global Warming Mitigati...
      • Gulf Rig Natural Gas Blowout: 47 Rescued
      • Kior Opens Wood To Oil Plant in Mississippi
      • Company To Produce Jet Fuel From Overgrown Forest ...
      • Forest Service Job Corps
      • San Bernardino National Forest Association Urban C...
      • Center President on Energy Panel at CBC Institute ...
      • EPA Software Helps Reduce Water Pollution
      • EPA Carbon Pollution Standards for New and Existin...
      • Healthy Forest Management and Wildfire Prevention Act
      • Liberty Natural Gas LNG Proposal Off NY & NJ Coast
      • Wood Cut To Prevent Wildfires Could Make Electricity
      • The New EPA Administrator Called Me Today
      • San Onofre Owner Starts Legal Action Against Mitsu...
      • DC Stormwater Management Final Rule & Guidebook
      • Senate Confirms Gina McCarthy as EPA Administrator
      • National Parks, National Forests, and U.S. Wildern...
      • FERC Orders $453 Million in Penalties for Western ...
      • California PUC Lawyers Want $300 Million Fine For ...
      • California Public Utilities Commission Votes To Un...
      • Wildfire Mitigation: Why Can't We Solve This Simpl...
      • California State Energy Panel Hearing on San Onofr...
      • The Prescott Granite Mountain Hotshots
      • Lac-Megantic, Quebec, Canada Oil Train Wreck Disaster
      • Federal Budget For Reducing Wildfires
      • The Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System
      • DOE Asset Revitalization Initiative
      • Wildfire Mitigation Program
      • Senate Approves Alison Macfarlane as NRC Chair
      • Power Africa
      • 19 Firefighters Die Fighting Wildfire In Arizona
      • EPA and Commerce Link Environmental Solutions Toolkit
    • ►  June (34)
    • ►  May (26)
    • ►  April (33)
    • ►  March (31)
    • ►  February (27)
    • ►  January (42)
  • ►  2012 (255)
    • ►  December (33)
    • ►  November (49)
    • ►  October (11)
    • ►  September (36)
    • ►  August (31)
    • ►  July (30)
    • ►  June (39)
    • ►  May (26)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile